![]() ![]() ![]() The first one is the realization that it is rather impossible to reconstruct the historical Socrates. ![]() Two important factors have contributed to this shift. It is only very recently that this trend has begun to change. Although Xenophon played a cardinal role in this investigation, he was cast in the shadow of Plato and treated with great prejudice, as an uninspired author with no original (philosophical or other) contribution and consequently, as an inadequate source for the reconstruction of the historical Socrates. historical) Socrates through the writings of his disciples. His statement reflects a trend in nineteenth-century scholarship, which was obsessed with resolving the so-called “Socratic problem” and tried to discover the “real” (i.e. Copenhagen.ġ§1 Kierkegaard was not alone in holding this opinion about Xenophon’s Socrates. The Concept of Irony with Continual Reference to Socrates (edited by H. …if Xenophon’s understanding of Socrates is correct, I believe that in sophisticated, inquisitive Athens people would rather have Socrates done away with because he bored them than because they feared him. A Comparative Study (Plato Lysis and Xenophon Conversations of Socrates 2.6)”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |